10.5281/zenodo.20282162
The 70-entry CHC Framework Series v1.0 archive is the stable target for citation, criticism, and correction tracking.
PhaseOrigin hosts a fixed 70-entry parent-and-companion manuscript archive with public review routes, claim-family status, and concrete comparison gates. The site is not a request to accept a replacement theory; it is a map for testing where proposed distinctions survive, narrow, fail, or retire against ordinary domain tools.
The routes below separate first reading, claim-family review, technical audit, current status, and archive access so readers can inspect one bounded surface at a time.
Read the fixed archive boundary, what is not being claimed, and how to test one bounded route before opening all 70 entries.
Compare each active claim family against its closest standard comparator, current verdict, evidence posture, failure gate, and upgrade gate.
Start from detector records, objectivity, interface budgets, or public-data windows rather than evaluating the archive as a monolith.
Inspect concrete cases, public references, reproducibility status, safe verdicts, and downgrade or retirement conditions.
Check objections, failed gates, blocked inputs, and desired outside review before assigning evidentiary weight.
Browse parent and companion manuscripts while keeping companion evidentiary weight tied to the parent claim or declared review lane.
Secondary notes covering interpretive background, finite-window measurement/objectivity criteria, and a raw-fragment QD/SBS benchmark; none changes the archive status by itself.
These examples route readers to a formula spine, diagnostic gate, public failed rerun, or typed claim-governance layer without asking them to accept the whole framework.
This is the first place where CHC can be challenged as mathematics rather than as a broad phase metaphor: action, positivity, reduction, and recovery have to carry the route being claimed.
theory-review target maintainer-self-audit
Useful as a formula anchor, not as proof of whole-framework validation.
This is a clean example of keeping a broad CMB-facing claim from becoming one large assertion. Each diagnostic can be inspected separately and held at partial status.
primary diagnostic partial public-reference-anchored
Primary diagnostic partial.
This is currently one of the strongest trust-building examples: the public rerun improves transparency while keeping the selection-stress failed classification visible.
selection-stress failed public-rerunnable
Public-rerunnable selection-stress failed.
The archive contains identities, recovery limits, compatibility checks, public-data labels, conjectures, and candidate bridges. Typed language is valuable if it prevents weak support labels from being promoted like theorems.
claim-governance layer maintainer-self-audit
Claim-governance layer.
The current surface separates orientation-only, likely redundant, candidate-only, blocked, public-rerunnable, and failed stress outcomes before assigning evidentiary weight.
SPAD, SNSPD, CCD, PMT, and bubble-chamber rows currently narrow the detector-record route rather than validate it.
Open the status basis
The named SBS-classical-record case currently reads CHC shared-fact wording as equivalent-or-weaker.
Open the status basis
The photoemissive thin-film case needs a public fixed calibration map before branch-budget language carries weight.
Open the status basis
The public rerun package improves transparency, but preserves the failed selection-stress label rather than converting it into support.
Open the status basis
Website guides, audit pages, and status ledgers help readers inspect CHC. They do not replace the manuscripts, add empirical claims, or promote companion records into parent-paper closure.
The 70-entry CHC Framework Series v1.0 archive is the stable target for citation, criticism, and correction tracking.
Audit and review surfaces record objections, failed gates, public-data windows, downgrade conditions, and residue retirement without moving the DOI target.