The Zenodo archive remains the citable target, so criticism has something stable to hit.
Research archive and review surface.
This research entry points to the fixed 70-entry series map, claim matrix, review routes, audit map, current status ledger, and canonical Zenodo archive. For outside researchers, the first question is not whether to accept a full framework, but whether a bounded claim family survives its closest ordinary comparator.
Keep objections visible without changing the archive.
The archive remains the citable source. A separate status page tracks open objections, candidate downgrades, failed gates, and next checks.
The review-status page shows which claims are most vulnerable, what would count as failure, and which objections would move the project.
Corrections, downgrades, failed gates, sharper references, and stronger tests become public status changes rather than hidden maintenance.
Bounded claims can be checked against ordinary comparators.
Each route reduces the archive to a bounded question with a comparator, failure condition, and status basis, without requiring full-framework acceptance.
CHC does not ask readers to replace established QFT, GR, cosmology, or open-system machinery.
It routes claims through local record formation, boundary conditions, ordinary comparators, and controlled recovery limits.
It asks which calculated structures become stable records, shared facts, interfacial outcomes, or bounded public-data constraints.
The practical entry point is one claim family at a time: detector records, objectivity, branch budgets, or public stress tests.
Use these notes after the claim routes are clear.
These entries provide interpretive background, a compact measurement/objectivity note, and a raw-fragment benchmark for QD/SBS-style redundancy tests. They do not add claims beyond the fixed archive and should not be read as validation of any claim family.
Phase-Background Realism
A philosophy-of-physics manuscript for interpretive background, bounded by recovery, ordinary-theory comparison, and failure-preserving evidence.
Adjacent research note
Durable Records and Redundant Objectivity
A quantum-measurement note separating measurement-map statistics, detector readout records, and redundant objectivity criteria on finite observation windows.
Adjacent research note
Raw-Fragment QD/SBS Benchmark
A synthetic raw-fragment QD/SBS benchmark for all-subsets redundancy, disagreement diagnostics, negative controls, and common-mode fragility checks.
Adjacent research note
Select one technical route before opening the full archive.
Each route identifies a technical surface and asks whether the bounded CHC claim survives its closest ordinary comparator. The route table converts the broad archive into inspectable entry points.
| Route | What to inspect | Current posture | Good first question |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematical spine | CHC-min action, constrained scalar sector, effective stiffness, and branch assumptions. | formula anchors for review, not proof of whole-framework validation | What assumptions make the root route well-posed? |
| Recovery limits | Controlled recovery, ordinary GR/QFT limits, and declared exclusion criteria. | ordinary limits remain the default comparator | What exactly is recovered, and at what order or window? |
| Detector records | SPAD, SNSPD, CCD, PMT, bubble-chamber, readout, latch, and durable-output rows. | orientation-only across completed detector-family rows | Does any record layer survive beyond ordinary detector/readout language? |
| Objectivity | SBS, quantum Darwinism, pointer stability, and shared-fact certificate comparisons. | likely redundant or equivalent-or-weaker in the named SBS case | Is the CHC certificate redundant, weaker, or stricter than standard objectivity criteria? |
| Interface budgets | Externalized, retained, and dissipated channels under a fixed calibration map. | candidate-only and blocked without a public fixed calibration artifact | Can one public calibration artifact close the branch budget? |
| Public-data gates | DE, CMB, TDC, FRC/CHIME labels and rerun or blocked-artifact status. | bounded labels: non-exclusion, partial, proxy, blocked, or failed | Which labels are non-exclusion, partial, failed, blocked, or rerunnable? |
| Typed sector language | Exact, recovery, compatibility, exclusion, and public-data labels across sectors. | claim governance only, not evidence promotion | Does the type discipline clarify claims without promoting unlike evidence? |
Included
- 70-entry parent-and-companion manuscript navigation.
- One-page first-reader overview.
- Framework orientation around phase, coherence, boundary conditions, records, and recovery limits.
- Per-paper guide pages with manuscript-based orientation.
- Current review-status page for visible criticism lanes and next review actions.
- Canonical Zenodo DOI link for the v1.0 public archive.
- Version-note slots for later corrections or updates.
Excluded
- No web-only claims.
- No empirical confirmation statement from the index itself.
- No final replacement claim for established physical theories from the index itself.
- No implication of journal publication, peer review, or independent validation.
- No claim that a single maintainer can complete full-framework validation alone.
Full release map.
Root and background branch
The covariant expansion-phase root and the homogeneous background response used as the public entry point.
Propagation, measurement, and records
Common propagation classes, event statistics, detector-local commit, readout, and shared-fact records.
Relativity, clocks, and bound structures
De Broglie recovery, light-speed distinctions, cosmic time, and phase-decoupling tests.
Matter response and dynamical memory
Composite matter, vibrational spectra, tunneling, and boundary-memory prototypes.
Calibration and public witness windows
Declared calibration ledgers and observational stress windows for cosmology, compact objects, and carrier conversion.
Gauge, electroweak, and strong-sector windows
Matter-coupled gauge sheets, anomaly ledgers, electroweak structure, confinement grammar, and fit windows.
Completion, duality, and typed synthesis
Vacuum selection, compact fibers, duality benchmarks, large-N comparators, and cross-sector language.
Phase loading, commit cadence, and mass loading
Late-series finite-window identities for phase loading, commit cadence, neutrino response, and charged-lepton loading.